Disclosed methodology
A transparent evidence method, not a mystery score.
FlatAEC records what is observed, separates it from what can be verified, and routes consequential decisions to the people authorized to make them.
Request a Spec AuditEvidence Governance is the foundation.
Every important public fact should trace to an exact entity, source, scope, date, owner, and review state.
| Stage and layer | Buyer question it answers | What we fix |
|---|---|---|
| AI Visibility | Can the right buyer discover the product, category, firm, expertise, or evidence? | Buyer questions, entity clarity, search and AI observations, source visibility, and competitor substitutions. |
| AI Readability | Can people and machines identify the source, scope, limitations, dates, and current facts? | Identity reconciliation, source lineage, document access, structured facts, dates, ownership, and review state. |
| AI Transactability | Can the buyer complete the correct next action? | Downloads, technical inquiries, branch and quote paths, capability requests, teaming inquiries, and proposal handoffs. |
The same method follows three different evidence identities.
- Manufacturer
- Product/model/application → test, approval, BIM/CAD, EPD, limitation → technical action
- Distributor
- Manufacturer/MPN/SKU/GTIN/category → current document and lifecycle state → branch or quote
- Engineering
- Firm/person/project/service/sector → qualification and past performance → pre-RFQ or teaming action
Eight labels keep uncertainty visible.
A recommendation is not presented as a verified fact. A missing record is not filled with a guess. A conflict remains visible until an authorized reviewer resolves it.
From a buyer question to a controlled handoff.
- 01
Scope
Name the organization, buyer, family/category/qualification path, questions, comparison sources, and actions.
- 02
Inventory
Collect public and authorized evidence and classify restricted, stale, conflicting, missing, or unknown material.
- 03
Observe
Record exact search, AI, page, document, and action behavior with date, location, account state, result, and limitation.
- 04
Reconcile
Connect entities, identifiers, sources, scope, conditions, dates, owners, and destinations.
- 05
Review
Route consequential facts to the client or qualified specialist and preserve unresolved questions.
- 06
Prioritize
Rank the smallest useful corrections by buyer impact, confidence, effort, and risk.
- 07
Handoff
Explain the evidence path, limits, roadmap, and measurement decisions.
The limits are part of the method.
- A source is never described as broader proof than its scope permits.
- A model code, procurement rule, standard, or listing is not automatically applicable everywhere.
- Unknown, missing, expired, conflicting, and not evaluated are valid reported outcomes.
- Confidential, personal, export-controlled, trade-secret, or otherwise protected material is not republished.
- The client or qualified specialist owns professional and compliance judgments.
- No ranking, citation, specification, quote, shortlist, contract, lead, pipeline, or revenue outcome is guaranteed.
Apply the method to one evidence path.
Choose a product family, product category, or qualification path and one buyer question worth answering.
This work cannot guarantee search rankings, AI citations, specifications, quotes, shortlists, contracts, leads, pipeline, or revenue.