Observation log
Platform, exact query or prompt, date, location, account state, and result or source.
Solutions
All solutionsChoose the evidence path that matches your organization.Building-product manufacturersProduct family to technical action.Commercial distributorsProduct category to branch or quote.Engineering consultanciesQualifications to pre-RFQ action.Spec Audit
Spec AuditScope, deliverables, timing, and limits.MethodThe evidence labels and review workflow.PricingOne founding price and three bounded audit units.Resources
All resourcesPractical tools organized by buyer task.Evidence checklistCheck one product family.Product page templateStructure approved product evidence.PDF to findable evidencePublish accessible document pathways.Qualification evidenceMake firm evidence usable before an RFQ.Fixed-scope evidence-path diagnostic
The Spec Audit tests where a real buyer loses the correct entity, supporting evidence, or next action—and gives your team a prioritized plan for what to fix first.
Request a Spec Audit| Organization | Audit unit | External buyer | Qualified action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | One product family | Architect, engineer, or specifier | Technical inquiry, submittal, sample, or rep |
| Distributor | One product category or catalog path | Contractor, designer, buyer, or account customer | Branch, quote, account, availability, or request |
| Engineering consultancy | One qualification path | Owner, prime, partner, or procurement stakeholder | Capability, teaming, pre-RFQ, or proposal handoff |
| Stage and layer | Buyer question it answers | What we fix |
|---|---|---|
| AI Visibility | Can the right buyer discover the product, category, firm, expertise, or evidence? | Buyer questions, entity clarity, search and AI observations, source visibility, and competitor substitutions. |
| AI Readability | Can people and machines identify the source, scope, limitations, dates, and current facts? | Identity reconciliation, source lineage, document access, structured facts, dates, ownership, and review state. |
| AI Transactability | Can the buyer complete the correct next action? | Downloads, technical inquiries, branch and quote paths, capability requests, teaming inquiries, and proposal handoffs. |
The output is a qualitative pass or gap, never a universal 0-to-100 score. Evidence Governance sits beneath every layer.
Platform, exact query or prompt, date, location, account state, and result or source.
Every item labeled Observed, Verified, Inferred, Recommended, Missing, Conflicting, Expired, Not Evaluated.
A qualitative pass or gap across Visibility, Readability, and Transactability.
Three competing entities or information sources tested against the same questions.
Changes ranked by buyer impact, evidence confidence, implementation effort, and risk.
A 60-minute decision session with commercial, implementation, and review stakeholders.
Confirm the organization type, audit unit, buyer, reviewer, trigger, and boundaries.
Agree on questions, comparison sources, evidence boundaries, actions, and platforms.
Collect public and authorized evidence; flag missing, conflicting, stale, or restricted material.
Run reproducible search, AI, page, document, and action checks.
Compare identities, entities, claims, sources, versions, limitations, and destinations.
Route high-risk facts and unresolved questions to the named client reviewer.
Deliver the 90-day roadmap and explain the next decision in a 60-minute readout.
This work cannot guarantee search rankings, AI citations, specifications, quotes, shortlists, contracts, leads, pipeline, or revenue.
A bounded path makes observations reproducible and produces a useful priority order instead of a shallow whole-site checklist.
The method and deliverables are shared. The identity, proof, buyer, reviewer, and qualified action change for a product family, category, or qualification path.
One commercial owner, one implementation owner where possible, and one qualified reviewer who can confirm the source, scope, and limits of consequential facts.
The target assumes no more than two business days for each client review round. A longer review pauses the delivery clock.
Yes. The roadmap is designed for internal teams or existing partners. A separate Evidence Path Sprint is optional and scoped only after the audit.
Choose your organization type, name the bounded path, and tell us what a buyer should be able to find, verify, or do.
This work cannot guarantee search rankings, AI citations, specifications, quotes, shortlists, contracts, leads, pipeline, or revenue.